Blog is about Genetic, Genetics, Genetic engineering, Genetic disorder & Bio technology
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Bio technology can remove the disability some pros and cons…
Here suggesting that there are not cases where it is both obvious and necessary for young children to be removed from or be able to leave homes where they are subjected to abuse and neglect. No parent can claim the protection of some kind of right, in order to justify their ill treatment of their child. Neither however can we claim that parents do not have some rights in relation to the child. The twin conceptions of parental obligations and parental rights are not mutually exclusive, we can develop a model of the parent/child relationship, that both acknowledges the fact that parents have some very strong obligations to their children, but also acknowledges that this is not a one sides affair, that parents can and do have rights, particularly in relation to how these obligations are fulfilled and the depth of state interference in the process of parenting.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Genetic Essentialisim and Embroy Identitiy.
This is a difficult position to defend, even from a standpoint to embryonic identity. However this situation only worsens when we begin to c...
-
Gene therapy must not be confused with cloning that has been in the news very much in the previous years. Cloning is generating a different ...
-
One of these concerns is already present in a non-genetic medical application. This is the type of objection raised by members of the deaf c...
-
Why then do people with disabilities there is a tension? Why would they not welcome the disappearance of the disability, in much the same wa...
No comments:
Post a Comment