Recently a number of cases involving the use of the cochlear implant as a ‘cure’ for deafness, and requests from parents with achondroplasia (dwarfism) or hereditary deafness, to have children who possess their disability, have highlighted problems with the position defended by Harris. The problems associated with requests such as these will become more common as our ability to manipulate our genes increases.
What factors would motivate the desire, on the part of persons with disabilities, to have a child who shares their disability, or not to ‘correct’ such disability when the option to do so exists? There are a number of reasons put forward for this choice. These include the idea of the value of Deaf culture(or any other culture surrounding a disability), issues relating to how persons with disabilities are viewed by the community at large, a fear of being unable to relate to and interact with a child that does not share their disability and the difficulties associated with adapting facilities and lifestyle to cope with a non-disabled child.
Blog is about Genetic, Genetics, Genetic engineering, Genetic disorder & Bio technology
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Genetic Essentialisim and Embroy Identitiy.
This is a difficult position to defend, even from a standpoint to embryonic identity. However this situation only worsens when we begin to c...
-
Gene therapy must not be confused with cloning that has been in the news very much in the previous years. Cloning is generating a different ...
-
One of these concerns is already present in a non-genetic medical application. This is the type of objection raised by members of the deaf c...
-
Why then do people with disabilities there is a tension? Why would they not welcome the disappearance of the disability, in much the same wa...
No comments:
Post a Comment